Home » Group asks INEC to ignore order calling for fresh election in Imo’s federal constituency

Group asks INEC to ignore order calling for fresh election in Imo’s federal constituency

by OkeomaNews

A group, Imo Youths Solidarity Movement has asked the Independent National Electoral Commission to ignore a court order from Imo State High Court ordering for a fresh election in the entire 11 wards in the Njaba Local Government Area of Nkwerre/ Nwangele/ Isu / Njaba federal constituency of the state.

INEC had suspended the election in the federal constituency after it collated results in Nwangele, Nkwerre and Isu LGAs and equally collated results in eight out of the 11 wards in Njaba LGA.

But while all the parties were waiting for INEC to fix a date for the completion of the election in the three remaining wards in the Njaba LGA, the candidate of the All Progressives Congress, Harrison Nwadike, approached a High Court in Owerri, demanding for a fresh election in the entire Njaba LGA.

Ruling on the motion, justice B.C Iheka on March 27 ordered that the results of the entire federal constituency shouldn’t be declared until a supplementary election is conducted in the entire Njaba LGA.

The judge’s order reads ” Until the Supplementary Election for the entire 133 Polling Units in the 11 wards of Njaba Local Government Area is conducted by Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) , the defendant, or any other person, whomsoever and howsoever, acting in her stead be and is hereby restrained from announcing or declaring the result of the 2023 Isu/Njaba/Nkwerre/Nwangele Federal Constituency election, pending the hearing and determination of the matter on Notice in this case.”

But reacting to the Court Order, the leader of the group, Chino Obioha, said that the prayers of the APC candidate were post election matters which ought to be filled at the election petition tribunal.

Obioha, said that the order was “incompetent” since INEC was not a party to the suit, adding that a state High Court lacked jurisdiction to stop INEC from completing processes of an election.

He said ” these are the reasons INEC shouldn’t obey the Court Order. The Order is not directed to INEC. The Order is incompetent by not making INEC a party to the suit. The defendant in the suit( the Federal constituency retuning officer) is an agent of INEC at the moment. You cannot bind a Principal through an agent. Rather you bind a Principal to stop the agents. 

“State High Courts have no Jurisdiction over INEC. Both by virtue of section 251 Subsection 1 (p) and (r ) of the 1999 Constitution as amended and section 84 (14) of the Electoral Act. 

“The injunction purports to stop INEC from performing its lawful duty. Section 84 (15) forbids Courts from stopping the process of an election.Election is a process that includes voting, counting of votes, collation of results and announcement of results. No court can stop this process. 

“The complaints of the applicant are post- election matter that should be challenged at the Tribunal. Section 24 of the Electoral Act is talking about actions in Emergency situations. There was no emergency at Njaba L.G.A. Election was peacefully conducted and results successfully uploaded to INEC Irev portal. 

“The stolen Form EC8B’s and EC8C of Njaba L.G.A was after election and collation. The Forms EC8A’s of the polling units results where election held are kept safe and intact including upload into INEC server. 

“Hence, section 24 of the Electoral Act cannot apply in the present circumstance. The polling unit results of election at Njaba L.G.A have been used to declare result of the Presidential election. The Certified True Copies (CTC) of the polling unit results have been issued to parties by INEC. The applicant Harrison Nwadike who came distant 3rd in the election, wants the election repeated for him.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment